Gilbane – Integrating External and Internal Social Efforts to Maximize Business Performance

Ken Efta – Allyis

Randy Zeigler – EMC

David Rosenberg – Edelman

Question: Does Edelman allow users to control what profiles are imported.
Answer: Yes. Discussion about Edelman being a relatively progressive company and whether or not other companies that may be more conservative would want information like skateboarding or bowling on internal profiles.

Question: Technology behind service
Answer: Using Newsgator toolbar to allow publishing of content internally and externally.  Rolled out Sharepoint 2007 with Newsgator. Sharepoint 2010 has a lot of social pieces put in. Sharepoint & Newsgator together allowed the social piece to be already put in.

Question: Use of Jive in both external and internal
Answer:  EMC’s implementation of Jive currently forces them to have an internal and external profile. Hosted separately. Every version of software gains maturity.

Sharepoint 2010 allows you to push profile information from external profile into internal profile. One real profile store and then choosing what information is on each profile.

Question: Adoption rates and metrics; Cultural challenges
David – One of the metrics was how many people actually created their home page; filled out their profile. Seeing a lot more profiles put in – social aspect and number of people contributing. Putting tools into place that made their life easier. Having the files that they were using for collaboration.
Randy – Internally, we’ve gone through “more is better” — measures of participation are users that created their profile. Any activity is good activity. That internally has now shifted to looking more at the social aspects are hard to quantify, but the focus on the business value to the groups that are trying to reinvent process. Lot of groups that are trying to offer unified architectures. People working all over the world and you need to bring those people together.
Randy – Externally the goal was to host the conversation, target certain audiences that were core to doing business and wanted to take the conversation to them. Adoption rate is important, but user generated rate of content and people connecting with each other (answering questions, etc.) is a metric they are focused on.
Ken – Unfiltered stream of social messages coming through was 1000s. Trying to identify the individuals that were doing high-value brought it down to dozens. Type of examples of the type of engagement they wanted. Portal was supporting sales and marketing and technical partners. Saw much higher engagement from technical partners.
Question: Adoption rates and metrics; Cultural challenges

David – One of the metrics was how many people actually created their home page; filled out their profile. Seeing a lot more profiles put in – social aspect and number of people contributing. Putting tools into place that made their life easier. Having the files that they were using for collaboration.

Randy – Internally, we’ve gone through “more is better” — measures of participation are users that created their profile. Any activity is good activity. That internally has now shifted to looking more at the social aspects are hard to quantify, but the focus on the business value to the groups that are trying to reinvent process. Lot of groups that are trying to offer unified architectures. People working all over the world and you need to bring those people together.

Randy – Externally the goal was to host the conversation, target certain audiences that were core to doing business and wanted to take the conversation to them. Adoption rate is important, but user generated rate of content and people connecting with each other (answering questions, etc.) is a metric they are focused on.

Ken – Unfiltered stream of social messages coming through was 1000s. Trying to identify the individuals that were doing high-value brought it down to dozens. Type of examples of the type of engagement they wanted. Portal was supporting sales and marketing and technical partners. Saw much higher engagement from technical partners.

Randy – People’s expectations in the space vary widely.

David – Edelman’s culture is different because they are already doing a lot of things externally. In terms of culture, have launched a reverse mentoring program for younger people already engaged on social media to teach those that aren’t about what they are doing and how they are working with social media.

Ken – At the heart of closing the loop is when you’re engaging to do those things and reaching out to customers, it’s all about relationships. You’re forging a relationship with customers and their peers. Every executive really likes getting out there and having the conversations with customers, this is just a better way to do it.

Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader.

  • http://topsy.com/trackback?utm_source=pingback&utm_campaign=L2&url=http://www.sueannereed.com/%3Fp=202 Tweets that mention Gilbane – Integrating External and Internal Social Efforts to Maximize Business Performance « Sue Anne Reed — Topsy.com

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gilbane SF 2010, Sue Anne Reed. Sue Anne Reed said: Notes from Integrating External and Internal Social Efforts to Maximize Business Performance http://bit.ly/a65GVy #gilbanesf [...]